Search for: "Mitchell v. People of the State of California"
Results 1 - 20
of 123
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Aug 2023, 1:14 pm
An earlier published opinion (Bartholomew) held that there was no statutory right for the state to appeal when the trial court reduced a felony wobbler to a misdemeanor prior to trial. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 8:23 pm
Last week, in Mitchell v. [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 5:27 pm
Three years ago, Mitchell reminds the justices, in a case called Birchfield v. [read post]
17 Nov 2013, 9:01 pm
” They convinced voters that the death penalty was needed to punish people like “Richard ‘The Night Stalker’ Ramirez [who] kidnapped, raped, tortured and mutilated 14 people and terrorized 11 more including children and senior citizens. [read post]
25 Nov 2008, 12:40 pm
(People v. [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 5:00 am
With only 23 people per square mile it’s less than half of the state average. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 9:30 am
" -- People v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 10:49 am
See Smith v. [read post]
3 Mar 2021, 1:13 pm
" Add to that to an earlier transcription that read (as described in today's opinion): "The People also look to Mitchell v[.] [read post]
19 Jun 2013, 10:55 pm
As Justices Thomas and Scalia discuss in their separate dissents in Mitchell v. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 2:19 pm
Mitchell, U.S. v. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 9:01 pm
There is serious confusion surrounding who is authorized to settle death penalty cases on behalf of the people of California. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 7:18 am
For example, in 2000, in Mitchell v. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 5:17 am
Remember attorney Mitchell J. [read post]
17 Sep 2023, 11:58 am
People v. [read post]
5 Aug 2016, 8:00 am
FailingerDenying the Poor Access to Court: United States v. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 10:12 am
United States (Tobacco; Federal Taxation)Mitchell, et al. v. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 2:10 pm
In Harlick v. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 5:26 pm
In 1913, California was one of the first States to prohibit the sale and possession of marijuana, and at the end of the century, California became the first State to authorize limited use of the drug for medicinal purposes. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 1:30 pm
These bounty orders remained in effect until at least 1868, when their constitutionality was finally questioned by the Minnesota Supreme Court in State v. [read post]
